An Evaluation of the rural development programme process
Read Online

An Evaluation of the rural development programme process a report to the Rural Development Commission

  • 685 Want to read
  • ·
  • 79 Currently reading

Published by Rural Development Commission in London .
Written in English

Book details:

Edition Notes

Bibliography: p83-84.

Statementby Public Sector Management Research Centre, Aston Business School.
SeriesRural research series -- no.5
ContributionsGreat Britain. Rural Development Commission., University of Aston in Birmingham. Public Sector Management Research Centre.
The Physical Object
Pagination87p. :
Number of Pages87
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL15194650M
ISBN 101869964128

Download An Evaluation of the rural development programme process


The Implementation Evaluation of the Comprehensive Rural Development Programme (CRDP) has been informed by a wide range of evidence obtained from various sources including: 18 CRDP site case studies (involving key informant interviews and 52 focus group workshops involving over. Rural development discourse and paradigms 3 Working definitions 3 Paradigm shifts over the last fifteen years 7 3. Relevant evaluations in the rural development sector 13 Introductory methodological remarks 13 Evaluation lessons on rural development 15 Evaluation lessons on agriculture and agricultural development The Rural development generally refers to the process of improving the quality of life and economic well-being of people living in relatively isolated and sparsely populated areas. Monitoring and Evaluation and data analysis Group Presentation, Report Write up And Communicating Results FIGURE 1. The Design and Process of the Training Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluation for Alternative Development (AD) Projects. Tools and methods for project monitoring and evaluation will .

and evaluation procedures during the design and implementation of rural development programmes: Consequently, this guidance documents help to define the concept of the ongoing evaluation, specify how the evaluation process should be organised (timing, minimum requirements etc.), in which way.   For the Scottish Government to evaluate the principles of the LEADER approach and review whether the focus on innovation truly serves the purpose of rural development. Lastly, since the whole of the LEADER budget of £ million has not been committed to projects yet, this paper only presents a snapshot of the programme as it is. Unit 6: Monitoring and evaluation Unit 6 explains the M&E process. It suggests guidelines and systems for effective problem-solving and ways to devise corrective measures when monitoring reveals discrepancies. This unit also explores the important area of evaluating projects and includes a step-by-step guide to the evaluation process. • If the evaluation process designed in such a way that a is informed and evidencewell- -based advice can be produced. • If there is any link between changes in Rural Development Regulation between the programming periods and policy recommendations emerging from the EU syntheses reports of national evaluation results.

Guidelines for Programme Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Table of contents KEY TERMS 1. This process is much more fundamental than one which is related only to organisations. Until now, professionals working in development cooperation have considered agriculture and rural development, catchment area re-forestation, water supply and. The community development process 12 1. Getting to know each other 13 2. Clarifying roles and skills 13 3. Grounding practice in community development principles 14 The evaluation of a program by those directly affected, and conducting the program. Self-evaluation is highly recommended in community development evalua-. x An Evaluation of the Outcomes of a Leadership Development Program viduals in varying points in their careers with varying needs; and (3) these types of leadership development programs are needed at the top levels of organiza-tions. For the evaluation of such leadership development programs, the . 4. International evaluation principles and standards 5 5. The management of project and programme evaluations by project partners (internal evaluation) 6 6. The management of project and programme evaluations by coordination offices or headquarters of the Austrian Development Agency (external evaluation) 8 7. Annexes 9 Definitions